Crawlability.ai
INDUSTRIES — TRAVEL

The itinerary is written before the booking site opens.

“Best boutique hotels in Lisbon.” “Where to stay in Tokyo with kids.” Travellers ask AI, get named recommendations, and arrive at a booking page already decided. The only question is whose.

TRAVEL-INTENT PROMPTS · northwind-hotels.comChatGPT · Gemini · Claude · Perplexity
PROMPT · BRANDS NAMEDENGINESCITED SOURCES
best boutique hotels in Lisbon
Meridian SuitesAcme RetreatsBrightlabs House
CGClP
boutique-travel-guide.com
citywise.io
where to stay in Tokyo with kids
Northwind HotelsSentinel StayAcme Retreats
CGClP
family-travel-hq.com
trip-editor.co
top-rated tour operators in Iceland
Compass ExpeditionsMeridian Voyages
CGClP
iceland-explorers.io
reddit.com/r/iceland
Present on 1 of 12 prompt · engine slotsMOSTLY ABSENT

You're not competing on the booking site anymore.

Travel planning used to run through search, aggregators, and review sites — channels where you could bid, list, and be found. Now a traveller describes their trip to an AI and gets three specific recommendations, with reasons.

By the time they reach a booking platform, the choice is largely made. The competition happened in a conversation you never saw — and if you weren't named, you weren't in it.

3 options
in a typical AI travel recommendation
0 impressions
logged when you're left off the list
4 engines
each recommending different places
WHAT TRAVELLERS ASK AI

Where the trip actually gets decided.

Where-to-stay queries

“Best hotels in [city] for [need].” The purest booking intent — and a shortlist you're on or absent from.

Destination and itinerary planning

“Three days in [city].” Engines build itineraries and name specific venues, tours, and restaurants.

Traveller-type queries

“Best [destination] hotels for families / couples / business.” Segmented intent, where being unmatched to a traveller type means being invisible to them.

Experience and operator queries

“Top tour operators in [region].” High-margin, high-intent, and frequently unclaimed.

WHY TRAVEL IS UNUSUALLY EXPOSED

Engines cite the guides. They rarely cite you.

Travel is one of the most heavily mediated categories online — guides, listicles, review aggregators, and editorial roundups sit between you and the traveller. AI engines lean hard on exactly these sources, which means the recommendation is usually decided somewhere you don't own.

A property can be excellent, well-reviewed, and perfectly positioned — and still be absent from an AI answer because the guide the engine trusts simply didn't include it.

01

Third-party guides dominate

Engines trust established travel publishers and aggregators. Your own site is often not the source being quoted.

02

Being unlisted is being invisible

If the roundups an engine cites omit you, no on-site fix changes that answer directly.

03

Specificity wins

“Best for [traveller type / need]” is a question most properties never answer clearly — and engines can only recommend what they can identify.

WHAT YOU MEASURE

Whether you're recommended, and who's deciding.

Destination presence

Across travel-intent prompts for your location and category, how often are you named — and on which engines?

Competing properties and operators

Which brands get recommended instead of you, and on which questions.

Cited sources

Which guides, roundups, and review sites engines pull from — so you know where the recommendation is really made.

AI-sourced bookings

Travellers arriving from AI engines, and whether they convert.

CITED SOURCES · northwind-hotels.com
Which guides and roundups engines actually cite
5 SOURCES · 4 ENGINES
SOURCETYPECGClPYOU
boutique-travel-guide.comEditorial guideNot listed
citywise.io/lisbon-hotelsCity roundupListed
family-travel-hq.comNiche guideListed
trip-editor.coReview aggregatorNot listed
reddit.com/r/travelCommunityNot listed
You appear in 2 of 5 cited sources · outreach targets flagged

Some of the fix isn't on your site.

When an engine recommends a competitor by citing a travel guide that omits you, on-site optimisation won't change that answer directly. We show you exactly which sources are driving the recommendation — but getting into those guides is a PR and outreach effort, not a technical one. We'd rather tell you that than pretend a markup fix solves it.

Questions travel teams ask

We have excellent reviews. Why aren't we recommended?

Engines don't rank purely on review scores. They cite sources they trust — often guides and editorial roundups. Strong reviews help, but if the cited source omits you, you're absent from the answer.

Does this work for hotels, operators, and destinations alike?

Yes. Anywhere a traveller asks AI for a named recommendation, the same measurement applies.

Can we influence the travel guides AI cites?

Not through us directly — that's an outreach effort. What we do is show you precisely which sources shape the answer, so you know where the work sits.

How do you choose which prompts to measure?

We derive them from what AI engines already say about your destination and category, rather than guessing from a generic keyword list.

Our bookings come through OTAs. Does AI visibility matter?

Increasingly, yes — because the choice is often made before the traveller reaches the OTA. Being named in the AI answer is what puts you in the booking that follows.